Legal Opinion

Salant v. Sauserman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1918No. Appeal, No. 14PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 14, March T., 1919, by defendant, from decree of O. P. Perry Co., Aug. T., 1918, No. 10, awarding and continuing preliminary injunction in case of Gabriel Salant et al., trading as Salant & Salant, v. J. K. Sauserman and Philips-Jones Company, Inc. Bill in equity for an injunction. Before Keller, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order continuing the preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Williams, J.,

March 30, 1917, defendant, Sauserman, agreed with plaintiffs that he would devote his factory and the machinery contained therein exclusively to the manufacture of shirts, giving them the entire output of said factory; that he would “do no work for another concern, nor sell, assign, lease or sublet said factory,......that if the contractor shall for any reason fail to pay his operators, go into bankruptcy, accept work from any other manufacturer or discontinue the factory, the plaintiffs shall be constituted his agents or trustees for the purpose of finishing out the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fredericks v. HuberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. Flaccus v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Equitable Trust Co. v. GarisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Taylor v. SauerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kline Township School District v. McAlooseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API