JSC Foreign Economic Ass'n Technostroyexport v. International Development & Trade Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge.
Defendants M & B Oxford 41, Inc. (“M & B Oxford”), P & F Equities, Inc. (“P & F Equities”), and Atrium Square, Inc. (“Atrium Square”) (collectively, “entity defendants”), object to Magistrate Judge Peck’s February 9, 2004 orders requiring M & B Oxford and P & F Equities to produce Michael Shine and requiring Atrium Square to produce Dennis John Edwards for depositions.
The Objections should be sustained only if the Magistrate Judge’s rulings were clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a).
The following facts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. William H. Webster, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Sugarhill Records Ltd. v. Motown Record Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- United States v. Afram Lines (USA), Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Independent Productions Corp v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cadent Ltd. v. 3M Unitek Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
- E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- Murata Manufacturing Co. v. Bel Fuse, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- COPAN ITALIA SPA v. PURITAN MEDICAL PRODUCTS COMPANY LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Galvan v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.