Legal Opinion

Connors v. Leachman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1987No. 52007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs Donald and Mildred Connors sued defendant George Leachman, Collector of Revenue of St. Louis County, to recover taxes paid under protest. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

Plaintiffs own two pieces of property containing at least five dwelling units. This property is classified “commercial” and subject to an assessment rate of 32 percent. § 137.016.1(3) RSMo. (Supp.1987). Plaintiffs paid the commercial tax rate under protest by submitting a protest letter with their tax payment. In their protest letter,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. HurtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Westglen Village Associates v. LeachmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. Associated Industries of Missouri v. State Tax Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. Stout Industries, Inc. v. LeachmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. Hampton Foods, Inc. v. Wetterau Finance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Buckhorn Rubber Products, Inc. v. RobisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Tri-State Motor Transit Co. v. HoltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. PetersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API