Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 9, 2001No. 5D00-393Published

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, W., J.

The state appeals from the trial court’s refusal to sentence Clark as a prison re-leasee reoffender because he committed the criminal offense of burglary of an unoccupied, dwelling. The state asks this court to agree with the first and second district courts of appeal1 that burglary of *978a dwelling, whether or not occupied, is a qualifying offense under the Prison Re-leasee Reoffender Act (PRRA). The trial court followed State v. Huggins, 744 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. granted, 761 So.2d 332 (Fla.1999), which held to the contrary. However, after the trial court made its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HugginsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. State v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Medina v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Medina v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. Hunter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API