Legal Opinion
Serody v. Chater
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 14, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 94-3412PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BUCKWALTER, District Judge.
This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denying the claim of William Serody (“Serody”) for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) provided under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”). The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment which were referred to the Honorable James R. Melinson, United States Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) on July 19, 1995.
The facts, procedural…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Harold MASON, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health & Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Podedworny v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Rachel R. Blalock v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- George Dobrowolsky v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Evelyn Plummer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999