Legal Opinion

McCarty v. Public Administrator

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

There is no identity between the cause of action asserted in the complaint and the issues decided in the earlier proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court. The complaint asserts a cause of action for the reasonable value of services rendered to the deceased. The proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court adjudicated that certain passbooks and cash were not given by the deceased to the plaintiff as a gift inter vivos nor as a gift causa mortis to compensate. him for his services. That fact would not prevent recovery for the value of the services.

The measure of damages in the present action is the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Strauss v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1961
  2. Metacoustic, Inc. v. Truitt Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API