Legal Opinion

Cal—Bay Corp. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1948No. 11695PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellants appeal from a decree in a condemnation proceeding awarding to each damages for the taking of the lessors’ and lessees’ mineral rights in land under leases for oil and gas development, upon which it is claimed there had been a discovery of petroleum gas of commercial quantities. They claim, inter alia, that by the refusal of a proper instruction on the valuation of the oil and ga's leases, the amount of damage awarded by the jury is grossly inadequate.

The maps in evidence, referred to in appellants’ briefs, show these oil and gas leases are of land in northern…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Montana Railway Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Robert A. Maheu, and v. Hughes Tool Company, a Corporation, Now Known as Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. 25.406 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  3. Maguire Oil Co. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  4. California Portland Cement Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. R. H. Phillips and Jessie E. Phillips, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API