People v. Calderon
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, J.
“Numerous California penal statutes allow increased punishment to be imposed upon a defendant if the prosecution alleges and *72proves that the defendant has suffered one or more prior convictions.” (People v. Saunders (1993) 5 Cal.4th 580, 585 [20 Cal.Rptr.2d 638, 853 P.2d 1093].) In People v. Bracamonte (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 644, 655 [174 Cal.Rptr. 191] (Bracamonte), the Court of Appeal stated, as a “ ‘judicially declared rule[] of practice,’ ” that a defendant is entitled to have the determination of the truth of such an allegation bifurcated from the jury’s determination of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. Bryant, Smith and WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. SandovalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.