Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Board of Election Commissioners

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 30, 2002No. 1-01-2283 RelPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quinn

Two sets of plaintiffs, who included Tara Brooks, Mary Strikland, Evie Crosby, Regina Fields, Johnny Solomon, Cheryl Wilson, Reva Price, Michael Lynch, Esmeralda Lopez, Bryan Tubbs, Christine Clark, Curtis Jeffers, Juanita T. Randle, Diane Randle, Willie B. Randle, Jr., Lawrence Tate and Ernest Lee, each filed a complaint to contest the validity of a local option election conducted in the 28th and 34th precincts of the 29th ward of the City of Chicago. In the election, two propositions regarding whether the sale of retail alcoholic liquor should be prohibited in the precincts were submitted…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hoogasian v. Regional Transportation AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Havlik v. MarcinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  5. Dick v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mashni Corp. v. Board of Election CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Brooks v. Board of Election Commissioners of the City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Mashni Corp. v. Board of Election CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API