Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Blend

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1981No. Crim. 4707PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON (P. D.) J.

Appellant was convicted of two counts of selling cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352) and was placed on felony probation for five years with service of nine months in the county jail and payment of a $500 fine imposed as conditions of probation. The main argument presented by appellant is that evidence of the sales of cocaine should be suppressed because information leading to the circumstances of the sales was obtained in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C. § 1385) which makes the willful use of the military in executing civil laws a criminal offense.

At…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. United States v. Michael A. WolffsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Ruby Davidson Walden and William Luther WaldenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  5. People v. BrannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. ToomeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. People v. BautistaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. ToweryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. People v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API