Legal Opinion

Roberts

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 3, 1953No. 120-53PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Unjust conviction; suit .under the provisions of 28 TJ. S. C. 1495,2513'.

On defendant’s motion to dismiss, the following per curiam opinion was filed:

Plaintiff is clearly not entitled to recover. The statute makes it a prerequisite to recovery that a plaintiff prove innocence of the crime for which he was convicted and other, things, and it prescribes that these things can only be proven by a certificate of the trial judge. We have no such'certificate before ús.

Defendant’s motion is granted, and plaintiff’s petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vincin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. Wood v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Roberson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  4. PhillipsUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  5. CephusUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API