Legal Opinion
Rosenthal & Company v. Dodick
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 17, 1973No. 73 C 1221PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BAUER, District Judge.
This cause comes on the defendant’s motion to dismiss or alternatively, for a change of venue.
This is an action based on diversity of citizenship seeking to redress an alleged breach of a Customer’s Agreement between the plaintiff and defendant.
The plaintiff, Rosenthal & Company (“Rosenthal”), is a limited partnership organized under the laws of.the State of Illinois, with its principal place of business at Chicago, Illinois. The plaintiff Rosenthal is a broker and dealer in commodities. The defendant, Jack M. Dodiek (“Dodick”) is a citizen…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Product Promotions, Inc. v. Jacques Y. CousteauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Lakeside Bridge & Steel Co. v. Mountain State Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Ronco, Inc. v. Plastics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- United States Dental Institute v. American Association of OrthodontistsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
- Muffo v. ForsythAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.