Legal Opinion

Gupton v. Quicke

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 15, 1994No. Record 930642PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Compton

In Virginia, we adhere to the rule that the owner or occupier of land ordinarily is under no duty to protect an invitee from a third person’s criminal act committed while the invitee is upon the premises. Wright v. Webb, 234 Va. 527, 530, 362 S.E.2d 919, 920 (1987); Klingbeil Management Group Co. v. Vito, 233 Va. 445, 447, 357 S.E.2d 200, 201 (1987); Gulf Reston, Inc. v. Rogers, 215 Va. 155, 157, 207 S.E.2d 841, 844 (1974).

In Wright, we fashioned a narrow exception to the general rule. There, in a case where an invitee was assaulted in a dinner theatre parking lot at night, we held that an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gulf Reston, Inc. v. RogersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  2. Wright v. WebbSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  3. Klingbeil Management Group Co. v. VitoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Yuzefovsky v. St. John's Wood ApartmentsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  2. Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson v. Skate America, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  3. Burns v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  4. Dudas v. Glenwood Golf Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  5. McKown v. Simon Property Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API