Commonwealth v. Cupps
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
Appellant was convicted of indecent assault upon a seven-year old girl. His appeal does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. The sole question for decision is whether the trial court committed harmful error by permitting the girl’s mother to testify to the details of the child’s complaint.
Appellant called at the mother’s home to collect a bill. She was at a nearby neighbor’s house, and two girl companions, who were on the front porch with the girl victim, left to summon the mother. In their absence the attack took place. The mother…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GardnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Commonwealth v. StalloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Commonwealth v. WerntzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Commonwealth of Penna. v. DegrangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. BanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. CheeksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Commonwealth v. KrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.