Legal Opinion

McKay v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 26, 2003No. A03A1032PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following a bench trial, Craig Robert McKay was found guilty of leaving the scene of an accident,* 1 failure to exercise due care, 2 no proof of insurance, 3 and DUI less safe to drive. 4 In this appeal, McKay contests the sufficiency of the evidence only as to his convictions for leaving the scene of an accident and DUI. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict. Grant v. State. 5 We neither assess witness credibility nor weigh the evidence but determine only…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Clay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Dworkin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sevostiyanova v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. Serrate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. State v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Hobbs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  5. Dalton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API