Legal Opinion · Dissent

Meis v. ELO Organization, L. L. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 10, 2001Published

1Dissent

Tom, J. P.,

dissents in a Memorandum as follows: In consideration of the Legislature’s clear intent in amending section 11 of the Workers’ Compensation Law to legislatively overrule Dole v Dow Chem. Co. (30 NY2d 143) except in a narrowly defined, and necessarily narrowly construed, set of circumstances, I respectfully dissent and would reverse to dismiss the subject third-party actions.

The basic facts are straightforward, relatively undisputed and require little elaboration. Plaintiff was employed by third-party defendant-appellant Spartan Plumbing & Heating, Inc. during June 1996, when he was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Ibarra v. Equipment Control, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Barbieri v. Mount Sinai HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Sutherland v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API