Legal Opinion · Dissent

Octave ex rel. Octave v. Walker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 2014Published

1DissentJustice Saylor

The Mental Health Procedures Act (MHPA) contains a proviso that “[i]n no event” may privileged communications be disclosed without “written consent.” 50 P.S. § 7111(a). As Madame Justice Todd observes, this appears to foreclose the possibility that, consistent with legislative intent, a non-written waiver may be implied from the circumstances. See Dissenting Opinion, at 1265. Accordingly, I cannot join the Court’s present holding that Appellants “have impliedly waived the MHPA’s confidentiality protections by filing the instant negligence suit[.]” Majority Opinion, at 1262 n. 9.1

With that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Fox v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Ferrell v. BrickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Mercy Convalescent Home, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Octave ex rel. Octave v. WalkerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API