Octave ex rel. Octave v. Walker
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentJustice Saylor
The Mental Health Procedures Act (MHPA) contains a proviso that “[i]n no event” may privileged communications be disclosed without “written consent.” 50 P.S. § 7111(a). As Madame Justice Todd observes, this appears to foreclose the possibility that, consistent with legislative intent, a non-written waiver may be implied from the circumstances. See Dissenting Opinion, at 1265. Accordingly, I cannot join the Court’s present holding that Appellants “have impliedly waived the MHPA’s confidentiality protections by filing the instant negligence suit[.]” Majority Opinion, at 1262 n. 9.1
With that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fox v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Ferrell v. BrickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Mercy Convalescent Home, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Octave ex rel. Octave v. WalkerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.