Legal Opinion
State v. Szefcyk
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1996No. 1995-1134PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 93.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. SZEFCYK, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Szefcyk,
1996-Ohio-337.] Criminal law—Res judicata—Doctrine bars convicted defendant from raising and litigating in any proceeding, except an appeal from that judgment, any defnese that was raised or could have been raised by defendant at trial. __________________ Under the doctrine of res judicata, a final judgment of conviction bars a convicted defendant who was represented by counsel from raising and litigating in any proceeding, except an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. SzefcykOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SzefcykOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- State v. MontgomeryOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. PerkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. DillinghamOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. ChurchOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. PerkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.