Legal Opinion
Dobosen v. Mescall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 2, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hubbs, P. J.:
The city council of the city of Lackawanna, after a public hearing duly held, passed a resolution refusing to grant its consent to the operation of a motor bus Une, as prayed for in a petition filed by the petitioner herein. Thereafter the Special Term granted a peremptory mandamus order directing the city council to rescind said action and grant consent to the operation of the bus line.
The question presented for our determination is whether the consent required by section 26 of the Transportation Corporations Law (added by Laws of 1915, chap. 667, as amd. by Laws of 1919, chap.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. . RosenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Ex parte DickeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
- People Ex Rel. Schwab v. . GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Beekman v. . Third Avenue R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
- People Ex. Rel. West Side Street Railway Co. v. BarnardNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. StrykerNew York Supreme Court · 1924
- Matter of Village of Bronxville v. MaltbieNew York Court of Appeals · 1940