Legal Opinion

State-Wide Insurance v. Luna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company established that it properly disclaimed coverage under its insured’s insurance policy on the ground of *883noncooperation by demonstrating that it acted diligently in seeking to bring about its insured’s cooperation, that its efforts were reasonably calculated to obtain its insured’s cooperation, and that the attitude of its insured, after the cooperation of its insured was sought, was one of “willful and avowed obstruction” (Thrasher v United States Liab. Ins. Co., 19 NY2d 159, 168 [1967]; see State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thrasher v. United States Liability InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ImeriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Allstate Insurance v. GuillaumeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West Street Properties, LLC v. American States Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. West Street Properties, LLC v. American States InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Matter of Hereford Ins. Co. v. McKoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API