Legal Opinion

Rush v. Heflin

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 3, 1982No. Civ. 2808PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a workmen's compensation case.

Briefly, the trial court ascertained that the parties were subject to the workmen's compensation law, that the employee was injured, that he was temporarily totally disabled for a certain period of time and that he was also permanently partially disabled. The employee was awarded compensation for such and since the employers did not have in effect any policy of workmen's compensation insurance and had not qualified as a self insurer, the awarded compensation was doubled pursuant to section 25-5-8 (e) of the Code of Alabama of 1975. The employers were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hester v. RidingsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  2. Harris v. VaughanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  3. Hous. Auth. of Town of Uniontown v. MizellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. Dupree v. DothardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sho-Me Motor Lodges v. JEHLE-SLAUSON CONST.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Simmons v. Clark Equipment Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ex Parte Fort James Operating Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Goglia v. BodnarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  5. Collins v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API