Legal Opinion

Dill v. Dill

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 31, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 118 N. J. Eq. 374.

For affirmance —Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, JJ. 7.

For reversal—The Chief-Justice, Case, Heher, Hetfield, Rafferty, JJ. 5.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Seylaz v. BennettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Blake v. BrennanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  3. Hanstein v. KellyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
  4. In Re Estate of ChurikNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Stiles v. NewschwanderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API