Legal Opinion
Dill v. Dill
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 31, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 118 N. J. Eq. 374.
For affirmance —Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, JJ. 7.
For reversal—The Chief-Justice, Case, Heher, Hetfield, Rafferty, JJ. 5.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Seylaz v. BennettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Blake v. BrennanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
- Hanstein v. KellyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
- In Re Estate of ChurikNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Stiles v. NewschwanderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.