Legal Opinion

Pineres v. George

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 27, 2008No. S08A0773PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNSTEIN, Presiding Justice.

We granted Caroline Pineres’ application to appeal in this contempt action arising out of the parties’ 1991 divorce.

1. We agree with Pineres that the trial court improperly modified the parties’ divorce decree in the context of ruling on the parties’ contempt motions when it shifted final decision-making authority regarding their minor son’s health care to their co-parenting counselor, Dr. Spencer Gelernter. “It is well settled that a trial judge has no authority in a contempt proceeding to modify the obligations imposed by the decree. [Cits.]” Gallit v. Buckley,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haggard v. Board of Regents of University SystemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  2. Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. FriedenbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Conley v. ConleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  4. Gallit v. BuckleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  5. Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fulton County v. LordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. BAARS v. FreemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  3. Vereen v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  4. Georgia Lord v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Valley v. South Atlantic Conference of Seventh-Day Adventist.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API