Legal Opinion

Blue Ridge Metal Manufacturing Co. v. Proctor

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1939No. Appeal, 240PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion ex

Me. Justice Schaffer,

This is an appeal from the order of the court below dismissing defendants’ motion to add additional parties as plaintiffs and to assess the costs against them. At the conclusion of the original hearing in the case, the chancellor found for the plaintiff, Blue Bidge Metal Manufacturing Company, and placed the costs upon defendants. This was affirmed by the court below in banc. On appeal to this court, the order was reversed and costs were placed upon appellee (the plaintiff) : 327 Pa. 424. Defendants’ motion to add additional parties and assess the costs was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blue Ridge Metal Manufacturing Co. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Neal to Use v. B.R. P. Rwy. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Janes v. CrowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  4. Commonwealth v. AbramsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SCHOR v. BeckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Hallstrom Development Co. v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. National Community Reinvestment Coalition v. Novastar Financial Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API