State ex rel. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of St. Louis
Supreme Court of Missouri
Mandamus. We understand the cases to decide that the midway line shall he adhered to in all cases except: 1. Where a platted lot fronts upon the street to he improved and extends beyond the midway line; 2. Where two or more platted lots used as one front upon th*e street to he improved and extend beyond the midway line. Collier’s and Kauffman’s case, 180 Mo. 362.
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
This is an original proceeding in this court by the relator to obtain a peremptory writ of mandamus against the city of St. Louis and its board of public improvements, directing them to receive and cancel certain special taxbills heretofore issued by said board to the Gilsonite Roofing and Paving Company in payment for work and material done and furnished by said company in the reconstruction of Grand avenue in said city from LaPayette avenue to Papin street, which said special taxbills had been duly assigned to and become the property of the relator, the Barber Asphalt Paving Company, and to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Collier Estate v. Western Paving & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1904
3Cited by8 opinions
- Granite Bituminous Paving Co. v. McManusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
- State ex rel. Skrainka Construction Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- City of Higginsville Ex Rel. Kasco, Inc. v. Alton RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1943
- Likes v. City of RollaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- State ex rel. Meek v. City of ChillicotheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.