Legal Opinion

Munger v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 28, 2007No. A06-1563PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge. *

Appellant challenges the district court’s summary denial of his petition for postcon-viction relief, arguing that he should have been allowed to withdraw his guilty plea because it was not supported by an adequate factual basis and was therefore not accurately made. Because Minn.Stat. § 609.582, subd. 1(a) (2004), requires a showing that appellant intended to commit a crime while within the building, a fact that was not established during appellant’s plea hearing, we conclude that it was an abuse of the district court’s discretion to deny appellant’s request to withdraw…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. EckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Hodgson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. State v. SotoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. NetlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API