Legal Opinion

Dominion Terminal Associates v. M/V CAPE DAISY

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 4, 1998No. Civil Action 2:98CV467PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

DOUMAR, District Judge.

This matter concerns the responsibility of a docking pilot in docking a ship at a pier. The Defendant Charles L. Roughton has filed a cross-claim against Defendants M/V Cape Daisy and Shinken Trading Panama Corporation in which he asserts that, by virtue of a “pilot’s exculpatory clause,” he is not liable to Defendants for ordinary acts of negligence while serving as a docking pilot on the Cape Daisy. Moreover, Defendant Roughton contends that such an exculpatory provision creates an indemnity right against Defendant M/V Cape Daisy and a right to all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Sun Oil Co. v. Dalzell Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Gulf Towing Co., Inc., Etc., Gulf Towing Co., Inc., a Florida Corp. v. The Steam Tanker, Amoco New York, Etc., Fred F. Enno, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Dow Chemical Company v. Tug Thomas AllenDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1972
  5. Reederei Franz Hagen Ex Rel. Verein Bremer Seeversicherer v. Diesel Tug ResoluteDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Enterprise Ship Co. v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API