Legal Opinion

Toney v. Toney

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 26, 1951No. 4-9292Published

1Opinion of the Court

G-rieein Smith, Chief Justice.

A plantation known as the McG-ehee Place was devised to six heirs in equal shares. One of the beneficiaries was McKenzie Toney, [“whose] interest is to be entailed on his three children,” naming them. The question is whether the father took a fee, as the Chancellor held, or only a life estate. The parent had acquired the remaining five-sixths.

Appellee cites some of our cases holding that the law favors early vesting of estates. So, where a will is susceptible of a dual construction, Doake v. Taylor, 195 Ark. 490, 112 S. W. 2d 958, and under one the estate becomes…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mansfield v. SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  2. Carter Oil Company v. WeilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  3. Moody v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1840
  4. Beasley v. ShinnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  5. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API