Legal Opinion
In Re Y.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 31, 1974No. 890PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
This is a child custody case. One of the parties has filed a motion requesting the Court to identify the parties by fictitious names citing Section 11.19(d), Family Code, V.T.C.A. The Court is of the opinion that the best interests of the parties and the child will be served by the granting of the motion. Therefore, the names and places are fictitious or general.
The father appellee brought suit for modification of a divorce decree seeking to change the custody of his three (3) year old son from the mother to himself. The mother appellant answered with a general…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Biggers v. Continental Bus System, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1957
- Ogletree v. CratesTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Taylor v. MeekTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1962
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Jackson v. Van WinkleTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Watts v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- McInnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
- Wilkins v. Royal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- C v. CCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.