Legal Opinion

Brennan v. Mead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action to recover “excess liability” for the bad faith breach of an insurance contract, the appeals, as limited by the defendants’ briefs, are from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated August 7, 1980, as denied defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and the defendant insurer’s cross complaint. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and cross motion granted. Plaintiffs were injured in a June, 1970 automobile accident and brought suit against one Clarence Welch. They sought to hold…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. S. T. Grand, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Vavolizza v. KriegerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Best Building Co. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. United States & Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. CopferNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Brennan v. FelterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. D'Arata v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Halyalkar v. Board of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Merchants Mutual Insurance v. ArzilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. DiBlasi v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API