Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Gilman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 15, 1877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Debt on a probate bond; brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County, and tried to the court before Beardsley, J. Judgment for the defendants, and motion for a new trial by the plaintiff for error in the rulings of the court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPark, C. J.

The facts found in this case, so far as they relate to the questions we have considered, are briefly as follows :

Sally Ogden by her will, made in 1857, bequeathed all her estate, after having made a single small legacy, to her sister Angeline Ogden, to use for the term of her life; and after her death gave the estate to certain other relatives, and upon certain contingencies to sundry charitable institutions. The defendants are obligors of a bond to the judge of probate for the faithful discharge by the defendant Gilman of his duties as administrator with the will annexed of the estáte1 of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Langworthy v. ChadwickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1838

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Balch v. HooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Wordin Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  3. Terry v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  4. Probate Court of Scituate v. AngellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1884
  5. Slagle v. EntrekinOhio Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API