Legal Opinion

Weingartz Supply Company v. Salsco Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 2015No. Docket 317758PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s order that granted defendant summary disposition under MCR 2.116(0(10). For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case requires us to interpret a section of an act that has not been fully interpreted in a published Michigan decision. The act involved, the Farm and Utility Equipment Act (FUEA), MCL 445.1451 et seq., regulates interactions between manufacturers and wholesalers (which the act labels “suppliers”) that sell farm and utility equipment to other businesses, and businesses (which the act labels “dealers”) that sell farm and utility…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ReccaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Adams v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Madugula v. TaubMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Meemic Insurance v. DTE Energy Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Fellows v. Michigan Commission for the BlindMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Traverse City Convention & Visitors Bureau v. Golden Swan Mgt LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. in Re Claim for Surplus FundsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. in Re Surplus Proceeds From Sheriff SaleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API