Legal Opinion
O'Neill v. Mayor of Hoboken
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 9, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions
On demurrer to declaration.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
The declaration in this case avers that, by “An act to provide for the drainage of certain lowlands in the city of Hoboken and the township of Weehawken,” approved April 4th, 1866 (Pamph. L., p. 941), several persons were appointed commissioners by and on behalf of Hoboken to exercise the powers and discharge the duties specified in the act; that in pursuance thereof the commissioners contracted with certain *68persons to construct a drain in Eerry street, in Hoboken, for the purpose of draining certain lowlands in the city; that those persons…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Carlstadt National Bank v. Borough of Hasbrouck HeightsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- O'Neill v. Mayor of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
- Harbold v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Township of Midland v. Borough of MaywoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910