Legal Opinion

Rudy v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 1980No. Appeal, No. 2502 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Claimant Cathy Rudy appeals from the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review’s determination that she was ineligible for benefits under Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 P.S. §802 (b)(1)1 because her voluntary termination from H & T Enterprises, where she had been employed for seven months as a massage attendant, was without necessitous and compelling cause.

The board expressly found that claimant voluntarily quit her job because she believed that she was being subjected to physical abuse and harassment by the customers of the employer. However,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Stevens v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Barni v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Slayton v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Ferry v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Gehouskey v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Defense Activities Federal Credit Union v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Vegh v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API