Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Ralston Purina Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1979No. 76-220PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The sole issue in this case is whether, where there is a dispute as to liability in tort between two parties and the alleged tortfeasor makes an offer of settlement accompanied by a check and credit memorandum, the retention of the check uncashed and the acquiescence in the fruits of the credit memorandum for a period of more than seven months constitutes an acceptance of that offer. We conclude that under these circumstances, where David Hoffman retained the check and credit memorandum for an unreasonable length of time with the knowledge that both instruments were offered in full settlement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hanz Trucking, Inc. v. Harris Brothers Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Thomas v. Columbia Phonograph Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Frank v. FrostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Draper v. RoddWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Associated Milk Producers, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Van Sistine v. TollardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  3. State v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  4. American National Property & Casualty Co. v. NersesianCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  5. Rockwood Manufacturing Corp. v. Amp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API