Legal Opinion

Husson v. Oppenheimer

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from special term, Westchester county. Action by Joseph Husson against Jacob Oppenheimer and another to recover moneys retained by defendant upon a sale of real estate to indemnify him for apparent sales of the property for water rates. From an order denying a motion to compel plaintiff to furnish a bill of particulars, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The complaint avers that, upon a conveyance by the plaintiff to the defendant of lands in Kings county, there was retained the *136sum of $450 to indemnify the defendant in case he had to pay some old sales for water rates on the property; that the money was retained in 1886, and that the defendant has never been called upon to pay the money, and has never paid it; that the sales were illegal and invalid. The complaint avers, also, that these water taxes were upon the property sold. The papers show that the money was retained on a tax search, which defendant produced. No case is made for a bill…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bender v. BenderNew York Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API