Legal Opinion

Russell v. Bowman, Heintz, Boscia & Vician, P.C.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 2001No. 49A02-0005-CV-338PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Plaintiff, Peggy J. Russell (Peggy), appeals the trial court's Order dismissing her Complaint against the Ap-pellee-Defendant, Bowman, Heintz, Boscia & Vician, P.C. (Bowman).

We reverse and remand with instructions.

ISSUES

Peggy raises four issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as the following two issues:

1. Whether the trial court erred in concluding that her Complaint was improperly amended.

2. Whether the trial court erred in concluding that her claim was barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Pe…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Middelkamp v. HanewichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Arnold v. DirrimIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Grove v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Owen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau General Insurance Co. of Michigan v. SlomanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Community Hospital & Fitness Pointe Health Club v. AvantIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. People v. CottonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. ABC Radiology, P.C., Jane Doe, John Doe, Anonymous Medical Associates, Inc., Sherry Patrick v. Cathy GearhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API