Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Sopher

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1995No. 22592PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLECKLEY, Justice:

The plaintiffs below and appellants herein, Mary Coleman, J. Wesley Coleman, and Michelle Coleman, appeal from the circuit court’s use of remittitur to reduce the amount of their jury award. The defendant below and appellee herein, Dr. Irvin Sopher, asserts that remittitur was proper and cross-assigns that the circuit court committed various other errors that prejudiced the defendant at trial. The circuit court at the request of the defendant and the acquiescence of the plaintiffs granted a new trial on the issue of damages. Before the commencement of the new trial, both…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. Hollywood Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Alfonso Avitia, and Diane Larsen v. Metropolitan Club of Chicago, Incorporated, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Findley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Robinson v. PackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Robert J. and Billye S. Front, etc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Andrews v. Reynolds Memorial Hospital, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Hanlon v. Logan County Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API