Simpson v. . Scronce
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by plaintiff from Gouncill, J., at November Term, 1909, of Catawba. The facts áre sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for the conversion of cotton. At the request of the plaintiff, the ease was referred by the court to C. M. McCorlde, to hear the evidence and pass upon the issues of fact and questions of law raised by the pleadings. The referee made his report to the court, and the plaintiff filed several exceptions thereto.
It further appears that, '“upon said exceptions, the plaintiff demanded a trial of the same by a jury.” He did not tender any issue as to any controverted fact which he desired to be submitted to a jury, but simply asked, in a general way, for a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Keystone Driller Co. v. WorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Ogden v. Appalachian Land & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baker v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Bartlett v. HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Robinson v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Jenkins v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Burroughs v. . UmsteadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.