Legal Opinion

DeMilia v. DeMico Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Troy Webber, J.), entered March 13, 2001, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants, although pointing to perceived deficiencies in plaintiffs proof, failed to meet their initial burden as summary judgment movants to make out a prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; Rothbard v Colgate Univ., 235 AD2d 675, 678). In any event, plaintiff responded to defendants’ motion with sufficient evidence to raise a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Rothbard v. Colgate UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clean Air Options, LLC v. Humanscale Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Yousuf v. NowakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Martin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  4. Martin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  5. Alvarez v. 21st Century Renovations Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API