Legal Opinion

United States v. Findett Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 3, 2000No. 99-3679PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBowman, Circuit J.

Findett Corporation appeals from the orders of the District Court 2 granting summary judgment to the United States on the government’s claim for recovery of response costs under CERCLA. 3 We affirm.

I

Beginning in 1962, Findett recycled chemicals at the location known as the Findett/Hayford Bridge Road Site in St. Charles, Missouri. As a result of the release of untreated waste, the groundwater and soil at the site became contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Following an investigation of the site, the United' States Environmental Protection…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Kelley v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. HardageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. USX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Findett Corporation, Acf Industries, Inc. General Motors Corporation the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company Mallinckrodt Chemical, Inc. Cadmus Corporation Milton TegethoffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API