Legal Opinion

Sweet v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1982No. 281S50PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIVARNIK, Justice.

Defendant-Appellant, Walter Sweet, was convicted by a jury in the Hancock Superior Court of eight counts of dealing in controlled substances. The substances involved were marijuana, cocaine and methaqualone. For his convictions, Appellant received three terms of twenty years each and five terms of four years each. The trial court ordered that each of these terms be served consecutively. Since Appellant was still on probation from a prior conviction, the trial court also ordered that Appellant’s probation be revoked and that his cumulative sentence of eighty years be served…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashton v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Lawrence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Watts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Meeks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Rowe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Shelton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Crose v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Burst v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Chambers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API