Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Stephenson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1891No. 3081PublishedCited by 38 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Presiding Judge,

Section B.—This was an action on debt. An attachment was sued out and levied on property; but the only question before this court is whether or not there was a material variance between the note declared on in the allegation in the petition, “that on or about the 11th day of October, 1888, the defendant made, executed, and delivered his certain promissory in writing,” etc., and the note offered in evidence by the plaintiff, dated October 12, 1888. In every other respect the note was correctly described. On objection by the defendant on the ground of variance the note…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McClelland v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Wiebusch v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. A. May & Co. v. PollardTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Lasater v. Van HookTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  2. Fowler Commission Co. v. Charles Land & Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. J. B. Parker & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Bell v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Central Nat. Bank of San Angelo v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API