Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 2014No. 2013-KA-0816PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL A. BONIN, Judge.

I,The district attorney appeals the trial judge’s decision to grant Tanislla Thomas’ motion to quash the bill of information. See La.C.Cr.P. arts. 538(3); 912 B(l). Ms. Thomas, in her motion, asserted violations of her statutory and constitutional rights to a speedy trial. The prosecution contends that Ms. Thomas’ right to a speedy trial under Article 578 A(2) of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure was not violated because the running of the two-year prescriptive period to commence trial had been interrupted.1

We have reviewed the trial judge’s ruling under an abuse…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. State v. BarahonaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. State v. WestLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. State of Louisiana v. Ernest C. Thibodeaux, Jr.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. State of Louisiana v. Felton ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API