Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. Leavitt Rentals

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 11, 1998No. Civil Action 97-2584-EEOPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EARL E. O’CONNOR, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motions to dismiss of all defendants (Doe. 17, 21, 27, 29, 39, 40), plaintiffs motions for entry of default (Doc. 24, 25, 26, 30, 32, 34, 36, 45, 47, 53, 62), and plaintiffs motions to strike defendants’ motions to dismiss (Doc. 43, 49, 51, 61). Plaintiffs motions to strike will be considered as memoranda in opposition to defendants’ motions to dismiss. After carefully considering the parties’ briefs, the court is prepared to rule. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motions to dismiss…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dubbs Ex Rel. Dubbs v. Head Start, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. King v. KnollDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2005
  3. Lewis v. Standard Motor Products, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  4. Zamora v. City of BelenDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2005
  5. Rigler v. LampertDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API