Legal Opinion

State of Missouri v. Lucas D. Jewell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 2015No. WD78039Published

1Opinion of the CourtGary D. Witt, Judge

The State brings this interlocutory appeal challenging the trial court’s grant of Lucas Jewell’s (“Jewell”) motion to suppress evidence of intoxicated driving. The State asserts error in the trial court’s determination that the campus police officer had no legal justification for stopping Jewell. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The facts in this case are not in dispute for purposes of this appeal. On September 15, 2013, University police officer Travis Cochenour (“Officer Cochenour”) initiated a traffic stop at 8:29 a.m. after the officer observed a vehicle fail to stop at two different…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Reid v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Heien v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. State ex rel. Missouri Public Defender Commission v. WatersSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API