Legal Opinion
Rosier v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 9, 1995No. 94-2011PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
655 So.2d 160 (1995)
Cleveland ROSIER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-2011.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 9, 1995.
Cleveland Rosier, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Amelia L. Beisner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
LAWRENCE, Judge.
Cleveland Rosier (Rosier) appeals an order summarily denying him postconviction relief. Rosier claims, among other things, that because he was sentenced as an habitual offender, his consecutive sentences are impermissible under Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Huff v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pace v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Eubanks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Moorer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Parrish v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.