Legal Opinion

Flood v. Keller

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1983No. 81-804PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

The plaintiff, Ronnie A. Flood, in his petition in error filed in the District Court, alleged that he had been an employee of the defendant The Metropolitan Utilities District until terminated, because of alleged acts of vandalism on his part, by action of its board of directors consisting of the remaining named defendants. He brought this error proceeding seeking a review and reversal of the board’s action, which was taken following a hearing mandated by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 14-1021 (Reissue 1977). Trial was had in the District Court on the transcribed tape recordings of the proceedings held…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anania v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Munk v. FrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Caniglia v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Blaha GMC-Jeep, Inc. v. FrerichsNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Lynch v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gas 'N Shop, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Langness v. " O" STREET CARPET SHOP, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. LeibelNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Nelson v. CoolNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Niedbalski v. Board of Education of School District No. 24Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API