Legal Opinion

Stennick v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 1, 1922No. 3783Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

This is an action by Parker Stennick, trustee in bankruptcy for the Hamilton Creek Timber Company, hereinafter referred to as the “Hamilton Company,” and the Rainier Lumber & Shingle Company, hereinafter referred to as the “Rainier Company,” against Willard N. Jones, Fred A. Kribs, and the J. K. Lumber Company. The complaint stated three causes of action. The third cause is the only one material to the present controversy. It states a case for an accounting of the value of certain property alleged to have been the property of the bankrupts and to have been surrendered to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Schall v. CamorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Vedin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Stennick v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
  5. Stennick v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API