Legal Opinion

Bank of Conway v. Hiegel

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 24, 1933No. 4-2967Published

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). In Taylor v. First National Bank of De Queen, 184 Ark. 947, 43 S. W. (2d) 1078, this court held that, where checks received in the ordinary course of business between respective banks, not for collection but for payment which they attempted to effect by charging them to the accounts of the depositors who had drawn them, and by delivery of the draft for the difference between the respective amounts of the checks, the relation of debtor and creditor arose between the two banks and not an agency or trust relationship.

It has been held, where the drawers of an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Loth v. MothnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
  3. Johnson v. First State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Taylor v. First Nat. Bank of DequeenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API